All Crows Look the Same

Through unseen eyes
Black on black
Beedy and beeding me
The unseen seeing all, unseen
That we see all the same
The one bird in the many
Thus the seeming sightless single beast
Is able to move unseen
En masse
In our world of personal sovereignty
Safe, at least for now,
As a singular multitude
Oxymoronic, axiomatic
A flock on automatic
A hive mind
Evading and
Outwitting us
Seen but unseen
Croci hidden
All
In plain sight but
All
Above our heads

Chris Reed

Three Cursing Crows

Croci the Crow cronked a cronk. A cronk is a crow call that says ‘There is that man from the car there, with a clipboard, a pencil, three cages and his bag of carrion’. The man just heard a croak and a collective set of caws returning the call around him in the woods. ‘Well,’ the man said, ‘the crows are definitely here.’ and put down his bag of carrion. The caronia carcass. The dead body. The prize. Croci had smelled it before the man entered the woods. Before he got out of his car. Croci had called the crow call ‘cawcsss’ (with a silent sss, at least to men), and as one, the crows converged, convened and conspired to steal his food.

One crow is all crows. They live en masse. No crow ever leaves the side of another crow. See one crow and you know some other crow is nearby. Each crow lives bracketed, like a word in a sentence, speaking about crows and what they intend to do. Crows calling to themselves be outspoken and literate in the wild non-human world, in the city, in the sky, on the rubbish dump, over the mountain top. Everywhere. Crows calling together to echolocate their fellow crows and hear their own call answering back, in the throat of another crow. And these crows spoke of theft and trickery, because tricksters are they all. The thing with the crow is they go with the flow, because adventurers are they all, always here but always going there. When they were away, they alway return to their nest, avoid the trap, trick away and escape and curse and re-curse the fools who tried to trick them one and all.

Croci set off the moment the bag of sweet-smelling rotten flesh hit the floor. All the crows so, set off too. All crows so landed too, in a circle around the man and his soon-to-be stolen bag of booty. Croci hopped right up to the man and his bag. Two fellow crows followed and triangulated and quartered him, hopped forth, took their third of the prize, and slipped into the cages to eat alone together in peace. They even closed the cage door, with a click and a clack and a corvidian caw. The caw is the call that says, ‘We have him. He is ours’. It is said of men, which is why man only hears this call. It’s subtext is ‘Sucker! and if crows could grin it would be said with a grin.

The man was pleased. He had to get three crows for an experiment and had planned for it to take a month or more, to train the crows with food, to trick them into the cages and carry them off to put them in his lab and test them. But the trap closed on the man the moment they put themselves in his cages, and he put them in his car.

The car was warm, and with their bellies full, the crows slept. They woke at the lab as the cold air tickled their nostrils and were put in a cage indoors on one perch, together as a three. The man went home, pleased with himself for gaining a month, for the ease with which his plan unfolded, for tricking the birds into taking his test. But all, with their far eye open so the man would see only three sleeping birds, the crows conspired and conversed. With little whiffles and shuffles of breath, imperceptible whispers and ruffles of jet black feathers, and almost silent clickings of bills, they had it all worked out. The way in was the way out. They knew…. How the cage was built. How the lock was clicked. Where the sun came from, so where the windows were. In the darkness, Croci conferred with his confederation of three. They reviewed and renewed their hasty plan made in the woods. If it was food the man thought had trapped them, it was food they would take from the man to undo his trap. They would refuse his tricks until they were fed, up to the gullet line under their bills, until he was fed up of their silence and their turned backs of sleek black feathers. For four weeks, they got fatter every day until they feared their weight would slow their escape, so then they turned and looked at him, and complied, complicitous and contrite. He suddenly found them friendly, almost apologetic, ready to do as he asked.

So off they went. Each was put in a separate cage. Each given treats for pecking at some marks on a piece of paper. Each chatting to the next. Each knowing where the other ones were. Each saying to all, what each was doing. Cribbing. cheating. conferring and sharing notes in the exam room with the answers given to the one by the one that went before. They saw and pecked some shapes like bones. Curved bones. Square bones. Cursive bones. Bones alone and in pairs, nested and bracketed in repeating patterns of self-similarity. It was easy. Funny little bones on white shiny sheets. They were the connoisseurs of bones. They were carrion crows.

They came into this world nested in a nest of other crows. Each knew their place. A pecking order from birth. Their family group bracketed together. Each a word in a crow call sentence. They partnered for life. Their partner and them bracketed for life. First single then double quotation marks quoting “I do” forever together. All chatter and clatter and calling names. All finishing each others croak called sentences. Each knowing what the other was thinking. Embedded, a single bird, in a family, in a pair, in a roost, in a rookery, in a flock, murmerating en-masse. One crow is all crows. Each lives in and through the other. Their life and living is made through self similarity. We is I is we, palindrome and palimpsest, each word uttered by the one, is covered by the rest. A three line, tree line poem.

So Croci and the crew were happy with their work. Or should I say holiday. A warm bed. Unlimited food. No predators. No men with guns. Simple tricks. Simple solutions. They made the law they lived by. Free. Rebels all. A parliament of crows. All for one and one for all. Croci and the crew knew the time and place to go. After the moon had rolled over her milky form three times, they would go at night. This was their plan. The man disappeared for two nights, three times every moon-turn. He had a shiny little bone he kept on a hook on the wall by the window. This clicked in the cage and made it open, but did not click to make it close. It remained by the window on their entering their cage. One night, after the games with the little bones on the paper, Croci landed on the man’s head and made him shout. An accomplice stole the shiny little bone when the man was not looking and put it under their wing. He went away blustering and huffing for his two days off.

On return, he found them gone. The window open and the cage lay bare. They left, cursing and re-cursing man, the fool, the sucker, the feeder, the tester, the test they passed with ease. Way too easy for minds en masse. Each bird a word in the collective prose poem that is crow life. The singular song. Of the flow of us Crow. One in all. Our call. We is Croci. We sing our name.

Begone wicked.
We is gone.

Chris Reed

Helping ND Brains Learn

This short article from Medium connects learning and brain activity and neurodiversity.

It revolves around neuroplasticity… ‘Neuroplasticity — the brain’s ability to reorganize itself by forming new neural connections — is not a static trait, but a dynamic process influenced by environment, behavior, and technology.’

The risks to ND brains from the highly structured algorithmic online world of scrolling and swiping is highlighted. An emphasis on fluid rather than fixed intelligence is developed.

The article states that studies from ‘Trends in Neuroscience and Education’ emphasize the need for embodied, curiosity-driven learning models. When students engage through movement, emotion, and autonomy, learning is retained more deeply.’

This is just what art making does. This potentially makes it particularly useful to ND brains.

Click here or on the image below to see the article.

Imagination and action

This research connects imagination of future action and active visualisation, with intention and action.

In meditative practice, this is called the ‘Approach Mentaility’, meaning people tend to be more positive about approaching rather than avoiding things.

The article says ‘..the course of action people entertain in their imagination can influence the probability of actually taking that path.’

The study suggests limits of actions within a week of imagining the action. But regular art practice will involve regular imagining of outcomes. In meditation, Dr Dan Siegel calls this the act of ‘the state becomes a trait.’, a mental state becomes a behavioural trait.

Art as personal research. Walk your talk.

I read this excellent article in The Independent.

Click the image below to read it.

‘Inside the scandal that rocked behavioural science – and paved the way for revolution’ : Helen Coffey – The Independent – June 29, 2025.

It is about behavioural science, that branch of science that studies human behaviour. In the article it addresses a crisis, that of reproducibility in research.

To be ‘objective’ or have quantitative or qualitative rigour, research results must show reproducibility. That is, that other scientists do the same research and get the same results or that the results may be generally or universally applied, not be shown to apply to one person, or just the people studied in the research. There is talk, as alluded to here, that many old research and new research findings may, on reflection, be a bit ‘subjective’. That is applied to just the subject of study, not the general population.

There is reference throughout to sample size. To be objective, research findings of people are best done with a large sample size.

But if you alone are the subject and object of your own research, it can still be research, but research simply about you and your behaviour, your experience. You are the sample. A sample size of one.

Art as research produces a subjective outcome, thus is open to interpretation. But in conducting research through art making, you make yourself open to interpretation. Your sample size is small, but as such it may be taken to apply to you alone. In showing and sharing, your art may resonate with other people, but again, subjectively. There is no better way. You own your subjectivity, and it owns you. You walk your talk. You have made yourself both object and subject.

The point is that through art making thou art approaching a state and inhabiting a process in which thou may, through art making, come to better ‘Know Thyself’. In this, there are health benefits.

art . outdoors . health